INMUNIDAD DE REBAÑO ES LA CLAVE PARA COMBATIR COVID-19

Suecia es el mejor modelo del mundo cuando lograron la inmunidad de rebaño sin imponer lockdown - cuarentena y uso obligatorio de mascarillas.La inmunidad de rebaño no es una estrategia, sino un fenómeno científico comprobado, y negarlo es tan tonto como negar la gravedad.Con la estrategia correcta, incluso podemos usarla para salvar vidas.Abierto ó cerrado?¿Abrir las escuelas y cerrar los pubs?¿Boleras abiertas pero no pistas de patinaje?¿Permitir restaurantes abiertos pero no recepciones de bodas?Gran Bretaña está jugando a las sillas musicales con diferentes servicios y negocios, pero todo el juego está equivocado y sin ninguna base epidemiológica científica.Abrir la sociedad gradualmente es ciertamente sabio, pero ¿cómo podemos elegir uno sobre otro?

Covid-19 es una enfermedad terrible y el objetivo principal debería ser minimizar las muertes.¿Cómo se hace esto?La clave es la edad.El riesgo de mortalidad por Covid-19 varía más de mil veces entre los miembros más viejos y los más …

Aprende inglés

Aprende inglés
Compañía líder en la enseñanza del idioma inglés en Panamá


The Hydroxy-chloroquine Scandal

 


This notion that a proposed vaccine may not actually stop SARS-CoV-2 infections, but rather manage symptoms of COVID-19, was clearly signalled by Pascal Soriot (CEO of AstraZeneca), who are partnering with Oxford University to develop a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Speaking on the BBC's Andrew Marr Show on 24 May, Soriot stated:

We are quite confident the vaccine will work, actually. The question is, will it completely clear the virus or stop people being sick … This is what happens with the flu vaccine, for instance ... It simply stops people from being sick … Being protected against being sick would already be a big plus.

When the WHO declared a global pandemic, chloroquine, and its modern form hydroxychloroquine, were the most obvious candidates for investigative clinical trials. Its possible effectiveness had, after all, been noted since at least 2005.

Scientists and doctors around the world took note of early promising clinical trials in China. In France, Prof. Didier Raoult, one of the world's most published microbiologists, announced his own trials. He stated that he thought it would be foolish not to trial chloroquine more widely.

Within days of the hydroxychloroquine trials starting, on 22 May The Lancet published a study by a team of four U.S. researchers from Brigham and Women's Hospital Center for Advanced Heart Disease. The paper alleged that hydroxychloroquine presented too high a risk of ventricular arrhythmia and potentially increased mortality for COVID-19 patients.

The WHO suspended hydroxychloroquine Solidarity Trials on 25 May. U.S. researchers did the same, as did German public health authorities, Inserm and many others. The WHO effectively triggered all the suspensions.

The study published in The Lancet was not just a scientific fraud, it was a glaringly obvious scientific fraud. All the data for the Brigham study came from a single source, Surgisphere, which promotes itself as a medical data mining company and which was founded by one of the study's authors, Dr. Sapan S. Desai.

Source: UKColumn

Entire article on the link below:


 The Hydroxy-cloroquine Scandal

 

 

Comentarios